Trump’s statements were central to their effort to win the bid. Trump released a new Agenda47 policy video vowing to once again ban insidious Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investments in order to protect American’s hard-earned savings and investments from woke financial scams. (Elsewhere, the suit points to the Trump Organization’s deal obtaining a ground lease for its Washington hotel, noting that project was “captained by Ivanka Trump, and Mr. Agenda47: President Trump Continues to Lead on Protecting Americans from Radical Leftist ESG Investments. Trump that required him to provide annual Statements of Financial Condition and certifications,” the lawsuit reads. Trump was aware that the transactions included a personal guaranty from Mr. “On each of those transactions with Deutsche Bank, Ms. Of Ivanka specifically, the lawsuit notes her involvement in securing loans to buy Florida and Chicago properties in 2012, loans that were issued in part due to false financial statements. To wit, James’s office claims in the suit that all three Trump kids “knowingly participated” in the scheme. Trump directly or indirectly created, prepared, reviewed, or certified any of her father's financial statements,” when the AG’s office has flatly accused her of being in on the alleged scam. The “other individuals” accused in the case are her father and brothers, so this comes off…rather awkwardly, and the takeaway from The Independent was that the former first daughter threw her siblings and dad “under the bus.” Setting all that aside, it’s also pretty odd that her lawyers are arguing that the lawsuit does not include a single allegation in which “Ms. “Other individuals were responsible for those tasks,” her lawyers wrote. Trump directly or indirectly created, prepared, reviewed, or certified any of her father’s financial statements.” Trump’s attorneys argue that the fraud complaint filed last year against her and her codefendants by New York attorney general Letitia James “does not contain a single allegation that Ms. Former President Donald Trump called for the termination of the Constitution to overturn the 2020 election and reinstate him to power Saturday in a continuation of his election denialism and. As for Ivanka? Her legal team took a slightly different approach. For his part, lawyers for the ex-president (and current presidential candidate) have argued that the evidence would take 11,000 hours to review, and that the trial should be pushed back six months. and his eldest daughter have asked for the start date to be delayed. Obviously, that result would be extremely embarrassing for the Trumps, which is probably why both Don Sr. Trump and the Trump Organization was astounding.” Should the company and family be found liable, the state has asked for a financial penalty of $250 million and for the ex-president, Don Jr., Ivanka, and Eric to be banned from ever running a business in New York again, among other things. Accused last year of committing a decade’s worth of “ staggering” fraud, the defendants-who have denied everything-allegedly made over 200 false and misleading valuations from 2011 to 2021, with AG Letitia James charging that “the pattern of fraud that was used by Mr. The New York attorney general’s case against the Trump Organization, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, and Eric Trump is set to go to trial on October 2, 2023.

Trump ayoa